[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] various reactions to supreme court travesty
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] various reactions to supreme court travesty
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dvd(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:32:36 -0700
- In-reply-to: <3E2AC20F.26639.164FD6B@localhost>
- References: <3E2AC20F.26639.164FD6B@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: KMail/1.4.3
On Sunday 19 January 2003 16:19, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> One should not tempt fate...personally, as a former jury member and juror
> foreperson, I hope that my time is not spent dealing with this lamentable
> law the next time I am summoned because as the ultimate decider of fact,
> there are far more important questions to decide involving judgment of the
> lives of others. I find it difficult to hold copyright infringment as a
> criminal offense greater than the strangulation followed by being thrown
> down a flight of stairs of the last case I sat in judgement with others.
> Copyright offenses are pale things that border on insignificance.
I'm not at all sure I agree.
Too many people have died for freedom of speech and other
"thought freedoms" to blithely toss them out as worth less than
a single life.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?