Wendy on Corporate Tone

I may be misreading, but I'm having difficulty reconciling this document with the work I'm interested in. This proposal feels very corporate. That may be because its aim is to secure funding, but if it will then be a constraint on the work that can be produced in conjunction with the funding, it's still a problem. Likewise, while I know we represent differing viewpoints on the role and importance of anonymity, this document appears to presuppose compromise on many of those positions. It might be that the result is a set of well articulated incompatible positions, from which implementers will have to make an explicit choice of which values to support.

Am I misreading the function or intent of the document? Then I'll be able to offer more concrete suggestions.