Biotechnology - Genomic and Proteomics/IP Profile of Universities working in BGP: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
** '''Graduate Group in Computational and Genomic Biology (http://computationalbiology.berkeley.edu/)'''
** '''Graduate Group in Computational and Genomic Biology (http://computationalbiology.berkeley.edu/)'''
*** '''provides training in the intersection of computational biology and genomics'''
*** '''provides training in the intersection of computational biology and genomics'''
**'''Berkeley Bioinformatics Open Source Project'''
***Gene Ontology Project: aims to reach consistent descriptions of gene products
** Division of Genetics, Genomics, and Development (http://mcb.berkeley.edu/)
** Division of Genetics, Genomics, and Development (http://mcb.berkeley.edu/)
*** studies replication, structure and evolution of genomes
*** studies replication, structure and evolution of genomes

Revision as of 20:48, 16 March 2009

Answer the questions:

  1. What are the 5 top Universities in this field?
    • Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools)
    • Understand and identify cases where these universities are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons based approach. Are they adopting OA policies, for instance? Are they adopting Social Responsible License approaches?
    • Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)
    • Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)


Note: I have bolded those projects that appear to be experimenting with commons-based approaches. From initial research, it seems that Stanford is the IBM of the university field, UC San Diego is the Microsoft

Navigation

Bibliography for Item 8 in BGP
Biotechnology_-_Genomic_and_Proteomics