Wikipedia 10K Redux by Reagle from Starling archive. Bugs abound!!!
<-- Previous | Newer --> | Current: 984032505 adsl-64-217-126-66.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net at Thu, 08 Mar 2001 06:21:45 +0000.
:By combining the AssociationistPsychology and [[Empiricism]] of [[Locke]] and the [[Totality]] of [[Newton]], French Materialism created a complex worldview reversing the [[Cartesian]] [[dualist]] worldview. Man a Machine by [[La Mettrie]] led the [[materialist]] charge. [[Helvetius]] brought about the [[materialist]] moral realm by introducing his RationalEthics. [[Diderot]] proved the dynamic philosophé presenting the world in constant flux and nature as creative. Combined with the new order of facts of [[Baron d Holbach]], the popularization of progress as a natural law by the [[Marquis de Condorcet]], and the [[Physiocrats]] belief in the Laws of Economy, these thinkers defined the French Materialist movement. :With Man a Machine, [[La Mettrie]] opposed [[Descartes]] on all fronts and asserted a combination of the mechanics of a single substance and matter in motion from [[Spinoza]] and [[Newton]], with self love as the prevailing law and the quantitative difference that separates man from animal. He agreed with the idea of [[Locke]] that humans form ideas from associating sensations and believed that we could grasp our own cognition but that we did not know how we grasped it. To [[La Mettrie]], the body controlled the mind - a mere effect of the body's working. La Mettries [[tediology]] postulated that the world has a reason for being and is going for some unknown goal and that man exists simply to exist without knowing the real reason. However, [[La Mettrie]] left many questions unanswered. :[[Helvetius]] introduced a higher [[rationality]] by which our competitive nature works for the higher good of [[society]]. He stated that the hidden hand of nature gave it a moral purpose, while our narrow view creates the war of all against all. His idea of progress as the key to a better world was not to create something new, but to eliminate the errors of our world. [[Helvetius]] created his RationalEthics (later dubbed [[Utilitarianism]]) which stated that there are only two motives: pleasure and pain. He postulated a society where self-love pushes us to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. He stressed that this society should only exist on the basis of the greatest good for the greatest number. He also said the keys to this society are universal education and an enlightened legislation. :[[Diderot]]s dynamic nature told him that things do not just change; things change for the better. This novelist, art critic and editor of the most famous product of the [[Enlightenment]], [[The Great Encyclopedia]], saw nature as a totality of creative changes. Each of these changes reverberates through all of nature to maintain a constant newness. This view agreed with [[Diderot]]s idea of progress that concurred with [[Helvetius]] elimination of errors, but proposed that we should also expand and create new institutions. [[Diderot]]s [[psychology]] differed slightly from [[Locke]]s as he saw the mind as active, forming general ideas then using those ideas to create more knowledge and ideas. :The [[Baron d Holbach]]s SystemofNature applied the MechanisticMaterialism to the whole of nature and proposed that consciousness has the ability to produce a new order of reality broken down into three subsets; brute facts, social facts, and mental facts. d Holbach thought it human nature to understand the world and act upon that understanding, such actions satisfied d Holbach's notion of progress. :The [[Marquis de Concorcet]]s [[Sketch of Intellectual Progress]] popularized progress as a natural law and sketched the key to such progress to be the advancement of [[science]] and its application to [[government]] and [[social order]]. The first philosophé to call for [[gender equity]], Condorcet also stated that [[history]] was moving towards a goal which would be the outcome of the application of [[reason]], a sort of scientific [[utopia]]. :Finally, the [[Physiocrats]] seemed to set the class boundaries with their model of the [[French]] [[economy]]. To them, the problems of the [[economy]] lay within the parasitic, landowning [[aristocracy]][ that seemed to serve no function but to hold the land. They thought the source of wealth flowed from the productive class, made up by the peasants, which they stated should be allowed to operate unhampered. The manufacturing class supported society with their goods. The [[Physiocrats]] coined the term LaissezFaire meaning to allow the [[economy]] to operate according to its own laws without alterations. They also first used [[capitalist]], as they wanted to transform the countryside from the [[seigneurial]] to the [[entrepreneurial]].