Bank Overhaul Is Held Up by Fight
Over Language for Interpreting Bill
By MICHAEL SCHROEDER
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers are still wrangling over language for
interpreting a White House-approved financial-modernization bill, delaying
action by the Senate and House at least until next week.
The landmark legislation, which eliminates
Depression-era barriers between banks,
insurers and securities firms, is moving fitfully
toward final approval because of
disagreements over wording of community-lending and privacy provisions.
The measure allowing cross-industry mergers would take effect
immediately after President Clinton signs it.
The path was cleared a week ago when House and Senate conferees and
the White House agreed on a final major sticking point: maintaining
satisfactory bank lending to low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
Staff lawyers and lawmakers from important House and Senate
committees and administration officials began crafting language last
weekend on several provisions that conferees and the administration
negotiated last week.
While the language in the 400-plus-page legislation has been completed,
disagreements persist over wording in the accompanying summary report
that explains how the bill should be interpreted. Lawmakers had hoped to
complete the process this week to clear the way for House and Senate
approval.
Democrats are angry about changes Republicans have tried to make that
conflict with earlier agreements, particularly on language requiring banks
and holding companies to maintain a satisfactory record on community
lending in order to be allowed to get into other financial businesses.
Other
problems stem from exemptions being inserted into the report. For
instance, the legislation prohibits banks, brokerage firms and insurers
from
disclosing account numbers to nonaffiliated third parties for marketing
purposes.
But Senate Banking Chairman Phil Gramm of Texas inserted a change
allowing marketing companies to buy that information and use it, as long
as
the data are encrypted beforehand and as long as they get the
accountholder's permission.
Sen. Gramm and GOP Reps. Jim Leach of Iowa and Thomas Bliley of
Virginia, chairmen of the House banking and commerce committees,
respectively, had planned to file the final bills Thursday night. They
must
receive signatures from a majority of the conferees before the measure
can
be sent to both chambers for votes.
--Dawn Kopecki contributed to this article.