September 8, 1999
NASD Regulatory Arm Proposes Rules
Aimed at Disclosure of Broker Incentives
By RANDALL SMITH
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
A top U.S. securities regulator proposed three new rules aimed
at curbing
or forcing disclosure of conflicts of interest when brokers have
an extra
incentive to sell securities or mutual funds.
One of the rules proposed by NASD Regulation Inc., the regulatory
arm
of the National Association of Securities Dealers, would require
securities
firms to tell customers of any higher payout formulas being received
by
brokers who jump from one firm to another.
Such higher payouts "could act as an incentive for the [broker]
to trade
customer accounts inappropriately by, for example, 'churning'
or trading
the accounts excessively, in order to generate as much revenue
as possible
during the time that higher commission payouts are being paid,"
NASDR
said in seeking comment from NASD members Tuesday.
The other proposed rules would bar higher payouts for brokers
who sell
their securities firm's own proprietary mutual funds and would
bar contests
promoting the sale of a single security. While higher payouts
for in-house
mutual-fund sales have long been a source of controversy on Wall
Street,
many firms have curtailed the practice.
"Although firms use differential compensation arrangements
for a variety of
products, the importance of mutual funds to retail investors may
make
differential payouts involving [mutual funds] of particular concern,"
the
NASD unit said. It added that one alternative to an outright ban
could be
disclosure to customers.
The proposal for disclosure of higher payouts to brokers who switch
firms
could spark even more heat, according to industry experts. Many
brokers
are receiving higher percentages of the commissions they generate
temporarily as part of lucrative incentive packages being offered
in the
current bull market in order to recruit them from one securities
firm to
another. Such higher payouts are known as "accelerated payouts."
Arthur Levitt, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
has
been pressing to reform broker pay for years. In 1995, an industry
group
convened by Mr. Levitt and led by former Merrill Lynch & Co.
chairman
Daniel Tully criticized the use of sales contests and upfront
bonuses as
potentially hazardous to investors' health.
In a speech last April, Mr. Levitt said single-product sales contests
were
"virtually extinct" and said a rule banning them "would
ensure their demise."
As for paying brokers higher commissions to sell in-house mutual
funds, he
said, "customers ought to be told when the only difference
between the
products is that the rep gets paid more for selling it."
The same is true for packages paid to brokers who switch firms,
Mr.
Levitt said. "I understand that the competition for representatives
can get
very intense, and I have no intention of interfering with that
competition," he
added. "But reps who are paid to switch firms may feel pressure
to trade
more after the switch. So it is imperative that customers know
the
incentives that were offered to their brokers."
In 1998, the NASD adopted a rule limiting the use of prizes, cash
or trips
to promote proprietary mutual funds or annuities -- another area
singled
out for criticism by the Tully report -- because such incentives
could tempt
a broker to sell an unsuitable product to clients.