April 26, 1999
Levitt Criticizes Securities Industry
Over Lack of Corporate Bond Data
By JUDITH BURNS
Dow Jones Newswires
SAN FRANCISCO -- Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
Arthur Levitt took the bond industry to task on Friday for not doing
enough to publicize price and trading information for corporate bonds.
Mr. Levitt's remarks to a meeting of the Bond Market Association here
came just hours after the industry trade group unveiled a new initiative
to
provide same-day price information on interdealer, investment-grade
corporate bonds. The voluntary, private initiative, dubbed Corporate
Trades I, is expected to provide price information for about one-third
of
the $2.4 trillion corporate bonds and notes outstanding, a result Mr. Levitt
called "disappointing."
"The technology exists to gather all corporate debt transaction prices,
distribute them and interpret them in a timely, accurate and efficient
manner," said Mr. Levitt. "The time has come to illuminate this needlessly
dark corner of our capital markets."
Investors need better price information, since many corporate bonds aren't
actively traded and their value must be inferred from prices for other
bonds, he noted. "That's why comprehensive price transparency is so
crucial."
Regulators need comprehensive price data as well, to produce audit trails
that help them monitor markets and ferret out fraud and abuse, Mr. Levitt
added.
The SEC chairman chided the industry group for not doing more to
provide comprehensive corporate-bond price data to investors and
regulators. He challenged the group to match progress made in the U.S.
Treasury debt market and in the $1.4 trillion municipal-bond market.
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board began providing daily
summary reports of interdealer muni-bond trades in 1995, he said, and
expanded that last year to include customer trading data. Real-time
reporting of municipal bond trades is on tap, and Mr. Levitt suggested
he
expects progress in that area "very soon."
Mr. Levitt seemed to hint that failure to make similar progress in the
corporate-bond sector could prompt the SEC to reconsider rules that
would require dealers to disclose their mark-ups on debt instruments.
Mark-up rules were last on the SEC's agenda in 1994, he reminded the
audience.
"We held off on the proposed measures because the industry told us that
transparency was a better alternative to mark-up disclosure," he noted.
SEC officials said Mr. Levitt wasn't threatening bond professionals by
bringing up the controversial mark-up issue, however. "That wasn't meant
as a veiled threat," Annette Nazareth, director of the SEC's market
regulation division, said after Mr. Levitt's speech.