To see a few ways in which these materials might be arranged, see the Case-Law Curriculum and the Global Curriculum
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119 (2d Cir. 1930)
- Alexander v. Haley, 460 F.Supp. 40 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)
- A.A. Hoehling v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 618 F.2d 972 (2d Cir. 1980)
- Steinberg v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., 663 F.Supp. 706 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989)
- Frank Music Corp. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., 886 F.2d 1545 (9th Cir. 1989)
- Stewart v. Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (1990)
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
- United States v. Moran, 757 F.Supp. 1046 (D.Neb. 1991)
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
- Lotus Development Corporation v. Borland International, Inc., 49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995)
- Fantasy, Inc. v. Fogerty, 94 F.3d 553 (9th Cir. 1996)
- Lee v. A.R.T. Company, 125 F.3d 580 (7th Cir. 1997)
- Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc. v. Carol Publishing Group, Inc., 150 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1998)
- Martin v. City of Indianapolis, 192 F.3d 608 (7th Cir. 1999)
- Aalmuhammed v. Lee, 202 F.3d 1227 (9th Cir. 1999)
- Lindsay v. The Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel R.M.S. Titanic, 52 U.S.P.Q.2d 1609 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
- Three Boys Music Corp. v. Michael Bolton, 212 F.3d 477 (9th Cir. 2000)
- Nunez v. Caribbean International News Corp., 235 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2000)
- New York Times Company v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001)
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001)
- Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S.1 86 (2003)
- Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, 539 U.S. 23 (2003)
- Pivot Point, Int'l v. Charlene Products, 372 F.3d 913 (7th Cir. 2004)
- Swirsky v. Carey, 376 F.3d 841 (9th Cir. 2004)
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005)
- Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co., 377 F.Supp. 2d 444 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
- Blanch v. Koons, 467 F.3d 244 (2d Cir. 2006)
- Perfect 10 v. Amazon.com. 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007)
- Cartoon Network LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc., 536 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2008)
- Intervest Construction v. Canterbury Estate Homes, 554 F.3d 914 (CA11 2008)
- Vernor v. Autodesk, 2010 U.S.App. Lexis 18957 (2010)
- Salinger v. Colting, 607 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2010)
- Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH (European Court of Justice, C-145/10, Dec. 1, 2011)
- Golan v. Holder, 2012 U.S. Lexis 907 (2012)
- Viacom v. YouTube, 676 F.3d 19 (CA2 2012)
- Temple Islands Collective Ltd. v. New English Teas Ltd., [2012] EWPCC 1
- Amy Adler, “Against Moral Rights,” 97 California Law Review 263 (2009)
- “Analysis of International Work-for-Hire Laws” (2004)
- Copyright Entitlements
- Copyright Exceptions and Limitations
- Copyright Litigation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation, “Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances: We Need to Read the Fine Print,” July 24, 2012
- Meir Feder, Edwin Fountain & Geoffrey Stewart, “What’s Wrong with the Copyright Regime,” in Fisher et al., “The Hope Poster Case,” 25 Harvard Journal on Law and Technology 244 (2012)
- William Fisher, “Theories of Intellectual Property,” in Stephen Munzer, ed., New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press, 2001)
- William Fisher, Promises to Keep: Technology, Law and the Future of Entertainment (2004), Chapter 6
- Urs Gasser, “Legal Frameworks and Technological Protection of Digital Content” (2006)
- Justin Hughes, "The Philosophy of Intellectual Property," 77 Georgetown L.J. 287 (1988)
- The International Framework of Copyright Law
- Stephen Munzer and Kal Raustiala, "The Uneasy Case for Traditional Knowledge," 27 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 37 (2009)
- P2P Foundation, Cultural Flatrate
- F.M. Scherer, "The Innovation Lottery," in Rochelle Dreyfuss et al., eds., Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property (Oxford Univ. Press 2001), pp. 3-21
- Traditional Knowledge
- Virginie Ulmann, “Architectural Copyright in France” (2010)
- Christopher Sprigman, “Reform(aliz)ing Copyright,” 57 Stanford Law Review 485 (2004)
- Madhavi Sunder, “Bollywood/Hollywood,” 12 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 179 (2011)
- S.K. Verma, “IP Protection of Software and Software Contracts in India,” 17 Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 284 (2012)
- WIPO, “Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances is Concluded,” June 26, 2012