View source

From OpenNet Initiative Conference 2007

You do not have permission to edit pages, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group Users.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Circumvention tools represent a technical remedy to filtering.  What are the technical and practical limitations of circumvention tools?  How does the promotion of circumvention tools complement other responses to Internet filtering?  Similarly, how does the availability of circumvention tools influence filtering choices?    What are the ethical and legal considerations in promoting the use of circumvention tools?    


Please sign up below for the Circumvention Tools breakout session

1. Rolf Wendolsky, University of Regensburg /Project AN.ON/ JonDos, rolf.wendolsky@jondos.de

2. Dominik Herrmann, University of Regensburg, dominik.herrmann@stud.uni-regensburg.de

3. Wolf Richter, OII

4. Jonathan Gordon-Till, Oxford Business Intelligence and InfoEthics.org.uk

5.Liz Williams

6. Janet Haven, Open Society Institute Information Program

7. Urs Gasser, Univ. of St. Gallen & Berkman Center

8. Andrej Dynko, nn.by editor, Belarus, dynko@arche.org.by

9. Thomas Hannen, BBC World Service Future Media

10. Daniel Babbington-Browne, BBC World Service Future Media 

11. Roger Dingledine, The Tor Project

12. Richard Clayton, University of Cambridge

13. Jane Gowan, The Citizen Lab

14. Xiao Qiang, China Internet Project, University of California at Berkeley

15. Shirley Hao, Human Rights in China (HRIC)

16. Uwe Witte

17. Daithí Mac Síthigh, Trinity College Dublin

18. Shing Mu YAU, Hong Kong Economic Times

19. Lance Cottrell, Anonymizer, Inc.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

32.

33.

34.

35.

Return to Circumvention Tools.

Retrieved from "http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/oniconference07/Circumvention_Tools"

View source

From OpenNet Initiative Conference 2007

Views

Personal tools

Navigation

Search

Toolbox