Circumvention Tools
From OpenNet Initiative Conference 2007
Circumvention tools represent a technical remedy to filtering. What are the technical and practical limitations of circumvention tools? How does the promotion of circumvention tools complement other responses to Internet filtering? Similarly, how does the availability of circumvention tools influence filtering choices? What are the ethical and legal considerations in promoting the use of circumvention tools?
Please sign up below for the Circumvention Tools breakout session
1. Rolf Wendolsky, University of Regensburg /Project AN.ON/ JonDos, rolf.wendolsky@jondos.de
2. Dominik Herrmann, University of Regensburg, dominik.herrmann@stud.uni-regensburg.de
3. Wolf Richter, OII
4. Jonathan Gordon-Till, Oxford Business Intelligence and InfoEthics.org.uk
5.Liz Williams
6. Janet Haven, Open Society Institute Information Program
7. Urs Gasser, Univ. of St. Gallen & Berkman Center
8. Andrej Dynko, nn.by editor, Belarus, dynko@arche.org.by
9. Thomas Hannen, BBC World Service Future Media
10. Daniel Babbington-Browne, BBC World Service Future Media
11. Roger Dingledine, The Tor Project
12. Richard Clayton, University of Cambridge
13. Jane Gowan, The Citizen Lab
14. Xiao Qiang, China Internet Project, University of California at Berkeley
15. Shirley Hao, Human Rights in China (HRIC)
16. Uwe Witte
17. Daithí Mac Síthigh, Trinity College Dublin
18. Shing Mu YAU, Hong Kong Economic Times
19. Lance Cottrell, Anonymizer, Inc.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
