Introduction:
While
in Europe legal problems related to information quality have been
primarily of academic interest, a publicly recognized debate on
information quality, which is also relevant for legal practice, has
emerged in the United States. The origin of this discussion was the
enactment of section 515 of the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001, better known as the Federal Data Quality Act, and its implementing Guidelines
for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and
Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies, issued
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). In essence, the Act and
OMB Guidelines are intended to ensure and maximize the quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of information (including
statistical information) disseminated by Federal agencies. Agencies, in
turn, were required to issue their own implementing guidelines by
October 1, 2002.
This essay seeks to provide, first, a brief overview over the genesis and content of the Federal Data Quality Act and the implementing OMB Guidelines. Second, against this background, the article examines this set of rules and regulations from the viewpoint of what—at least in the European context—is termed information law. It may be of interest to compare the U.S.’s attempt at a functional and open regulation of information quality by law with earlier contributions of European theorists to this area of law.