Cluster Groups Template/Form: Difference between revisions
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Key Intended Attributes of Intervention== | ==Key Intended Attributes of Intervention== | ||
(5) Primary (or initial) context of intervention: | |||
*Formal learning | |||
*Informal learning | |||
*National (focus on one country) | |||
*Multinational | |||
6) Primary Actors: who drives implementation? | (6) Primary Actors: who drives implementation? | ||
*Content creators | |||
*End users (teachers, learners, etc.) | |||
*Facilitators/intermediaries | |||
*tool builders | |||
*distributors/content hosts | |||
*publishers | |||
*schools | |||
*other: (please specify) | |||
*Researchers | |||
*Policy makers | |||
7) Requires new intermediary or supporting organization? | (7) Requires new intermediary or supporting organization? | ||
*Can be implemented by existing organizations. | |||
*Would require a new consortium of existing organizations | |||
*Would require expanded cooperation of an existing cooperative arrangement of institutions | |||
*Would require the creation of new organizations to implement | |||
8) Intended Timeframe: | (8) Intended Timeframe: | ||
*Hackable? i.e. able to explore, initiate or pilot with a short burst of hacking/development, including Friday’s Hackday?; | |||
*Short-term – reaches maturity in less than a year | |||
*Medium-term – reaches maturity in 2-4 years | |||
*Long-term – reaches maturity in more than 4 years | |||
9) Ongoing management needs - low, medium, or high? | (9)Ongoing management needs - low, medium, or high? | ||
*Low – little additional effort to maintain | |||
*Medium – significant ongoing effort required to maintain | |||
*High – intensive effort to maintain | |||
10) Contributes to High Quality OER Supply: | (10) Contributes to High Quality OER Supply: | ||
*Aimed at facilitating sustainability? | |||
*Aimed at facilitating re-usability of OER? | |||
*Translation component? | |||
11) Contributes to Supportive Policies: | (11) Contributes to Supportive Policies: | ||
*Requires or is focused on supporting legal and/or formal policy changes? | |||
*Focus of policy intervention: | |||
**Institutional level | |||
**National | |||
**Global | |||
(12) Contributes to OER standards: | |||
*Facilitates feedback and quality assessment? | |||
*Promotes interoperability? | |||
*Promotes accessibility? | |||
*Promotes discoverability? | |||
(13) Adoption & Reach: | |||
*Expands audiences and increases OER adoption? | |||
*Engages non-traditional audiences? | |||
*Focus on community building? | |||
*Requires significant public outreach campaign? | |||
*Likely to face opposition from vested interests? | |||
*Behavioral changes or cultural shift required? | |||
(14) Research & Evaluation: | |||
*Supports evidence-gathering, data collection, impact assessment? | |||
*Requires more research and supporting information? | |||
14) | |||
==Implementation Requirements/Considerations== | ==Implementation Requirements/Considerations== |
Revision as of 16:40, 9 April 2012
Overview of Intervention
(1) Intervention Title
(2) Brief description of the intervention
(3) Cluster Identifier (letter)
(4)Level of intervention: Micro, meso, macro or research?
- Micro: intervention is focused on impacting creators and users. Associated keywords: Learning & Teaching, Guidance/Training/Mentoring, Customization/Reuse/Remix/Business & Sustainability Models
- Meso:Intervention focuses on the intermediaries, infrastructure and elements that help to link creators and end-users and contribute to building the systemic elements that facilitate the delivery, distribution and flow of OER materials. (Associated keywords: Accessibility, Tools & Technology, Search & Discoverability mechanisms, Quality Control, Accreditation, Feedback mechanisms)
- Macro:intervention addresses broader systemic issues such as policy and legal frameworks or behavioral and cultural aspects that shape the overall OER ecosystem. (Associated keywords: Supportive Policies, Copyright & Licensing, Community Building, Lobbying)
- Research: focus is on improving information and effort to understand the opportunities, challenges, impacts and efficacy of various OER strategies and mechanisms. (Associated keywords: Impact assessments, Evidence gathering and sharing, Case Studies)
Key Intended Attributes of Intervention
(5) Primary (or initial) context of intervention:
- Formal learning
- Informal learning
- National (focus on one country)
- Multinational
(6) Primary Actors: who drives implementation?
- Content creators
- End users (teachers, learners, etc.)
- Facilitators/intermediaries
- tool builders
- distributors/content hosts
- publishers
- schools
- other: (please specify)
- Researchers
- Policy makers
(7) Requires new intermediary or supporting organization?
- Can be implemented by existing organizations.
- Would require a new consortium of existing organizations
- Would require expanded cooperation of an existing cooperative arrangement of institutions
- Would require the creation of new organizations to implement
(8) Intended Timeframe:
- Hackable? i.e. able to explore, initiate or pilot with a short burst of hacking/development, including Friday’s Hackday?;
- Short-term – reaches maturity in less than a year
- Medium-term – reaches maturity in 2-4 years
- Long-term – reaches maturity in more than 4 years
(9)Ongoing management needs - low, medium, or high?
- Low – little additional effort to maintain
- Medium – significant ongoing effort required to maintain
- High – intensive effort to maintain
(10) Contributes to High Quality OER Supply:
- Aimed at facilitating sustainability?
- Aimed at facilitating re-usability of OER?
- Translation component?
(11) Contributes to Supportive Policies:
- Requires or is focused on supporting legal and/or formal policy changes?
- Focus of policy intervention:
- Institutional level
- National
- Global
(12) Contributes to OER standards:
- Facilitates feedback and quality assessment?
- Promotes interoperability?
- Promotes accessibility?
- Promotes discoverability?
(13) Adoption & Reach:
- Expands audiences and increases OER adoption?
- Engages non-traditional audiences?
- Focus on community building?
- Requires significant public outreach campaign?
- Likely to face opposition from vested interests?
- Behavioral changes or cultural shift required?
(14) Research & Evaluation:
- Supports evidence-gathering, data collection, impact assessment?
- Requires more research and supporting information?
Implementation Requirements/Considerations
15) Financial requirements: low, medium, high? a. Low - can be implemented with little or no additional funding b. Medium - less than 100k per year c. High - more than 100k per year
16) Coordination needs - low, medium, or high? a. Low - able to launch without recruiting other participants b. Medium - requires coordination and buy-in of several organizations c. High - requires broad coordination/buy-in
17) Dependencies - low, medium, or high? a. Low - stand alone intervention that requires no complementary efforts; b. Medium - depends on another change/intervention; c. High - depends on several other complementary interventions/changes
18) Level of risk and uncertainty - low, medium, or high? a. Low – results are predictable b. Medium – reasonable degree of predictability c. High – results are unpredictable
19) Implementation complexity - low, medium, or high? a. Low – easy to implement b. Medium – reasonable to implement High – it is complicated c. 20) What types of innovations are required for development and implementation? (short answer)
21) Additional important considerations that have not been covered in the questions above? (short answer)