Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Google Books Settlement Open Workshop
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 50: Line 50:
# Jennifer Gordon, [http://www.law.harvard.edu/library/ Harvard Law School Library]
# Jennifer Gordon, [http://www.law.harvard.edu/library/ Harvard Law School Library]
# Michelle Pearse, [http://www.law.harvard.edu/library/ Harvard Law School Library]
# Michelle Pearse, [http://www.law.harvard.edu/library/ Harvard Law School Library]
# Mary Daniels, [www.gsd.harvard.edu/loeb_library/special_collections.index.html Francis Loeb Library / GSD]
# Mary Daniels, [http://www.gsd.harvard.edu/loeb_library/special_collections.index.html Francis Loeb Library / GSD]
# Joey Mornin, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu Berkman Center for Internet & Society]
# Joey Mornin, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu Berkman Center for Internet & Society]
# Chris Peterson, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu Berkman Center for Internet & Society]
# Chris Peterson, [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu Berkman Center for Internet & Society]

Revision as of 13:19, 9 July 2009

Alternative Approaches to Open Digital Libraries in the Shadow of the Google Book Search Settlement

An Open Workshop at Harvard Law School

July 31, 2009

Sponsored by the Berkman Center for Internet & Society and Professors Charles Nesson, John Palfrey and Phil Malone


Scope and Goals

The proposed Google Book Search settlement creates the opportunity for unprecedented access by the public, scholars, libraries and others to a digital library containing millions of books assembled by major research libraries. But the settlement is controversial, in large part because this access is limited in major ways: instead of being truly open, this new digital library will be controlled by a single company, Google, and a newly created Book Rights Registry consisting of representatives of authors and publishers; it will include millions of so-called “orphan works” that cannot legally be included in any competing digitization and access effort, and it will be available to readers only in the United States. It need not have been this way.

This workshop seeks to bring a fresh, unique perspective to a complex and widely debated topic. It will focus not on the specific merits and demerits of the settlement itself, or the particular antitrust and privacy and other objections that have been raised. Instead, it will examine the idea of possible alternative universes and offer specific proposals for scenarios that may arise whether or not the settlement is approved . What can libraries, or universities, or non-profits, or Congress, do in the current landscape? And how might these possibilities help us to define a better world than the one that we have today and, more importantly, than the one that will exist if the Google settlement is approved in its current form? Regardless of what happens with respect to the Settlement, what alternative possibilities could lead to a richer, more open and better information ecosystem than the one we have today or might have tomorrow with the Settlement?

By exploring these alternatives, this workshop seeks, in the end, to help inform the debate over the Settlement and its terms and to illuminate some of the key policy considerations that are at stake. Its ultimate goal is to develop a series of options and proposals that could improve on the status quo in novel ways.


Proposed Topics

Here are some tentative topics for beginning discussion at the workshop. We welcome feedback on these suggestions and encourage you to contribute your own proposals. We'll choose several of the topics to be incorporated into our agenda. (To edit this wiki, you must register for an account via the link in the upper right hand corner of this page).

  1. What might truly open access to orphan works look like
  2. What might a truly “open” digital collection created by major libraries look like
  3. What might a truly “open” global library look like
  4. What would a truly “open” digital library look like
  5. What might truly open access to and use of an online digital library look like
  6. What might online, digital publishing and access look like going forward
  7. Are all of these the same? Within the open environment what is closed?

Resources

Please add links to papers, articles, blogposts, and other items related to GBS and of interest to workshop participants to this page. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/googlebooks/Resources


Proposed Agenda

TBA based on proposals and feedback listed above.

Registration and Participants

To register for this workshop visit http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dGlzQUUxWW9rcVpUZ01qd2JmaXhPd0E6MA.

If you wish for your name to be listed on the wiki in this section, please indicate your preference on the registration form.

  1. John Palfrey, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  2. Phil Malone, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  3. Charles Nesson, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  4. Jennifer Gordon, Harvard Law School Library
  5. Michelle Pearse, Harvard Law School Library
  6. Mary Daniels, Francis Loeb Library / GSD
  7. Joey Mornin, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  8. Chris Peterson, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  9. Gosia Stergios, HBS Knowledge & Library Services
  10. Lewis Hyde, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  11. Harry Lewis, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  12. David Weinberger, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  13. Amar Ashar, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
  14. Siva Vaidhyanathan, http://www.googlizationofeverything.com/, University of Virginia
  15. Ines Zalduendo, Frances Loeb Library / Graduate School of Design
  16. Bill Comstock, Harvard College Library
  17. Mansooreh Saboori, Harvard Law School Library

Location, Directions, and other Logistical Information

Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/googlebooks/?title=Main_Page&oldid=99"