Jan10

From CyberOne Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

feedback

the key in the loop of learning

the inferred self
where some may be on the path of disappointment

where are we

dimensions

teaching how to learn teaching how to think across dimensions because doing so allows you to put problems that are mystifying into context that allows you to see them clear

where are we along the path of learning


to teach is to allow students to watch you learn

note the methodology

understand the framework within which the learning takes place

more on feedback

food at the break

group work

reconfigure the room, six groups, each constituted as an avatar, someone in the group in second life

socratic role play

defendant's good character, how can you use it, how can you use bad characher to go after a witness


# 1 jan.2: Terms on which WE Start: Original Position: Liberty
  1. 2 jan.3: Protection of Liberty Built into Process and Privilege
  2. 3 jan.4: GUILT Beyond Reasonable Doubt
  3. 4 jan.4 afternoon or evening
  4. 5 jan.6 evening: A Showing of A Civil Action, with pizza
  5. 6 jan.7: Trial as a Constructed Drama of Evidence Offered and Tested to Prove Tort or Crime
  6. 7 jan 8: Evidence Discovery and Spoliation
  7. 8 jan.9: Materiality -- Framing the Question
  8. 9 jan. 10 Keeping Relevant but Prejudical Character Evidence from the Jury (or not!)
  9. 10 jan.11: Credibility and Confrontation
   * 10.1 outside of class, afternoon or evening
  1. 11 jan.14: Hearsay and Exceptions
  2. 12 jan.15: Experts in Criminal Cases
  3. 13 jan.16: Experts in Civil Cases
  4. 14 jan.17: Attorney Client Privilege
  5. 15 jan.18: [[The Rules of Evidence in Play]]
   * 15.1 outside of class, afternoon or evening
  1. 16 jan.22: Exam

review where we are in the rules intro 100's purpose 200, what do we know, the rules of the game on which we agree; if we are playing by different rules then we are actors in a bigger game with common rules 300, where do we start, what are our starting assumptions and burden of persuasion 4oo, what's good evidence, substantive down through 404, heading down today through 413 past 500 privilege to 600 witnesses

up to fashioning the rules for dealing with defendant's character let's play it out with okay want the defendant to be able to represent his good character to us, but how

let's let them come to their own conclusions about 405

let's do it with a graph on the board of the issues, the proof,

jan. 10 Prejudical Evidence

What is evidence of a defendant's or a witness's character
How may evidence of character be used?
as direct affirmative proof of an issue in contest
as inferential affirmative proof
as attack on credibility
People v. Zackowitz
Return to the Scene of the Crime
"Money or Death"
United States v. Beechum
Proof of Defendant's Good Character
Proof of Defendant's Violent Character
The Mayor
Tanford & Bocchino, Rape Shield Laws and the Sixth Amendment
Prostitution, Rape or Both?
Explanation for Pregnancy
My Cousin Vinny: Opening Statement
Personal tools