Feb 18
From CyberOne Wiki
colvin is right, and brilliant, schools train the kids to beat the cops to get out of an authority structure that makes them feel bored and stupid.
i want presbelewski and colvin to be teachers in my school.
i want kids to watch the wire with me and then come back and go over and say where the mistake was made and what was the other choice.
kevin writes i have an appointment with the commissioner on monday at 10:30 am. i want to show him my best essays and convey to him how much i want to teach. i want to show him the graphic from pokerstrategy
google hypothetical: future of university
mission of university
position of the assn of internet university service providers
fair use: bye bye to the transactional base
open the university with a presidential poker game, all proceeds to go for running the open school
strategic thinking expressed in action making a play according to your assessment of the position and strength of the other players in your game.
bluff of authority often not as strong as it makes itself appear.
for an inmate in prison there are two laws, authority law and inmate law, authority imposed from the force outside that makes the prison, authority from the force within. the stronger the compression the deeper the evil. how to teach and how to learn to loosen up.
in baltimore two laws. colvin and prez offer strategy to loosen up, get real, win.
think in media terms. hollywood, listen up. let me use your product in open education. me and prez teach math. a new kind of school. embrace parents and love their children. follow colvin down the path of enlightenment to the point of hope in kids.
i want to show the wire in kingston prison, and talk about it. i want to show it in juvenile.
Contents |
feb 22
teaching with the wire in serial form with each segment the subject of a lecture i give straight to camera and a structured discussion that can take place in various formats including groups face to face, facebook friendship groups, groups in second and third life.
present it to hbo as a business proposition with measure of success the increase in demand for their product
model in jamaica taking a cable channel
i'm wanting to take the patrick video from the doar panel and put it on the gpsts site, and start a rhetorical poker game in quest of the question who put the criminalization provision into the bill. i am wanting to help the governor get this out of the bill and an educational thrust into it which would make it much stronger. i'm wanting to come at this question in a way that would make sense to omar and colvin.
juan carlos has an approach that combines research and code, looking at isp contracts for neutrality provisions and developing an app that detects filtering and compelling by law isp's to publish hard data on their quality of service.
European Court of Justice just three weeks ago rules that universities need not respond with identity of students.
juan carlos is asserting legal ground for eu to follow sweeden's lead in allowing aggregation of archive material under a collective license theory that obviates need to obtain permission for each copyrighted work. this approach makes sense given the obvious fact that were we starting from scratch to work out a system of copyrigh in a networked world we would never have built a transactional system, therefore it makes sense as a means of transitioning the law from the dead structure of the past to a new mode of rewarding creativity to forego the transactional base in favor of a collective system when the overwhelming transaction cost of the old clearance system is clearly stifling constructive development of social knowledge.
feb 23
one programs a digital environment, one conducts it like a symphony
the judiciary quite rightly presumes reason and requires only rationality in legislative statutes which do not infringe upon any constitutionally articulated right. to do otherwise would intrude judicial prerogative into legislative domain.
this means that legislative statutes which infringe on unenumerated rights and which are the product of corrupt influence have no check from the judges of the courts, only from the discretion of the executive in enforcement which may itself be driven by the same corrupt influence. only the check of the american jury fills this hole in the bottom of the cup of the constitutional machine.
to provide this fundamental check to abuse of government authority the citizens who comprise a jury should have their responsibility explained. what is the role of a juror in the constitutional architecture of a massachusetts and american trial.
this means that the judiciary is no check on legislative statutes which are the product of special interestbacked by executive enforcement for statutes which though rational lack reason and are pushed through by special interest. the check for that in our constitutional system is trial by jury.
we do not claim that a right to smoke marijauna was explicitly articulated in the declaration or rights of the Commonwealth or the consitution of the united states, though we believe our founders would have been amazed at the notion that their liberty to smoke what they chose was being put into government hands. yet the law is the law the court must speak, which makes rationality the test by which the statute of the legislature making possession of a small amount of marijuana a crime.
how then must a court give voice to the check of the jury in order for the jury to be a check on the expression of self interest and corruption in legislative and executive process.
we should offer to prove a prima facie case that the statute and its executive enforcement is out of whack with the common sense of the people.
how would we prove it, with video of ali g, with video of stroup, with data on referenda. we break out of the brief with links to digital media
just editing lester's affidavit, can we light the links to studies up, can we figure out a way to do it as a common project
from andrew: We’ve hit some bumps – apparently Cambridge takes the stance that ALL poker is gambling, even if it does not involve ANY prizes or buying whatsoever. If that is correct (I’m getting this information 3rd hand) then it is clearly not a move that will stand up in court, but may slow us down. In any event, I’ll have more information this coming week (I have meetings on it this week) and will keep you updated.
we need enough faith in our own legal judgment to resist the power of the commissioner, articulated in an emergency petition to a single justice if no redress in time a tourney led by me played with hershey's kisses.
feb 24
ready for a rush larry gives me great idea and contact with lauren palfrey for berkman and perhaps for harvard law juan carlos for nexa
internet & society can we have your support we are four u
first question at google gathering identity of avatars behind each a student expressing truth
feb 25
socrates never wrote because he knew he didn't know anything saw this portrayed in insightful portrayal for the craziness of this man of wisdom
i go in search of the rational basis test against which the statute criminalizing marijuana possession should be judged. what is the test that defines the outer bound of judicial constraint on legislative power when the statute infringes on an unenumerated liberty.
help define a domain of govermental recognition that stands for unenumerated liberty
is there such domain
when we the people created the legislature did we mean to empower it with unlimited power over all things unenumerated? no, we meant to invest our legislature with power reasonable and proper
yochai points to duopoly as the problem
kevin's commission can't do more than urge others to act on that
tim wu urges a rule of no discrimination among lawful applications
all agree that transparancy is nice but gives consumers no real choice in an environment of weak competition and high transfer costs, either click through the small print of read it to learn how you are being fucked.
can the isp's live with tim wu's rule? can the fcc enforce it? is there some big problem with tim wu's rule that i don't see.
feb 26
what happens when you turn the process of producing media gets turned inside out tons of people in the business of making media comcast appears before the fcc at harvard berkman center and stuffs the hall with paid attendees. this took decision by the executive charged to run the presentation and advice of consultants. this occurs in an environment in which
what is the highest technique you hope to achieve
to have no technique
feb 27
charles nesson for keith stroup has there ever been a massachusetts case to overthrow a statute for failing the rational basis test.
suppose we make a prima facia case that a subtantial number of citizens regard marijuana as a blessing. let that call into play a presumption of liberty strong enough to counter the complete presumption to the legilature and move instead to a daubert standard,
