- e.2008
From CyberOne Wiki
POKER TEACHES strategic thinking in work and play, life and law
initial offerings by professors nesson and lederer
with Andrew Woods and Kevin Wallen, Annie Duke, Brandon Adams, Ken Stalter
participation invited by pst societies around the world (formed or in formation)
accompanied by bilateral pst discussion and play ( e.g., cambridge v. cambridge)
culminating in face to face invitational tournament and conference
we study poker as history, game theory, entertainment, education and law
we read great books, watch great films, and play great poker
Ours is an adventure in teaching and learning in cyberspace. Join us.
thanks to my daughter rebecca for her inspiration and guidance in all dimensions of this enterprise. thanks to my daughter leila believing in my aspiration. thanks to fern, my partner in all things, for being my e.
Contents |
e
e = evidence
evidence is object in context from which another draws meaning - that's u.
i&i - that's me
i am here to teach you how to make and understand evidence, how to testify, how to judge. i am here to think with you about how we make and understand meaning.
our fields of play include fundamental concepts of number and dimension, poker, the American Jury Trial and the explosively expanding net
where are you along the path of learning
- Flatland, Edwin Abbott (to loosen your ability to see in different dimension - what seems complicated in one dimension may be simple when seen from another)
- buy a journal book, find a pen you like to write with, keep a journal for this course, or if you choose, keep a digital journal
- in your journal - what is your passion, what is the question driving your life
We will follow the story of jury trial from magna carta to the present, as played out in the rules of evidence, in the roles of the players, and in how the roles are played.
We will tell the story of poker along the way.
- each day in your journal your distillation of what you have learned
Terms on which WE Start: Original Position: Liberty
EVIDENCE: The Law of Trial By Jury
- Conceptualizing the "original position"
Imagine a land of heroes and heroines each one of whom has liberty and a personal sense of responsibility. Call this group WE THE PEOPLE. Count yourself among us. How do WE the PEOPLE not lose our Liberty yet still claim the benefits of GOVERNMENT?
Imagine yourself speaking to this challenge in the voice of a founder about to make a government by which WE will seek to govern ourselves, knowing as we do that a government will promulgate, interpret and enforce rules that will threaten to stifle our liberty.
form groups
- My Cousin Vinny: Charged
Protection of Liberty Built into Process and Privilege
Process of Law
- Breyer, Active Liberty pp. 15-34
- Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation pp. 3-48
- "jury" - as Scalia would, start with the word - jury - a noun derived from juris - law
- The American Jury: Bulwark of Liberty
- the problem of pockets of resistance to the common good
- peers of the viscinage, peers of the district
- trial by jury in the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights
- trial by jury in the Constitution of the United States of America
- racism in the Constitution of the United States of America
- trial by jury in the early courts of the Massachusetts and the Nation
- the problem of pockets of resistance to the common good
- Nullification of the Jury's Role as Check to Legislative and Executive Power
- Trial by Jury Constrained by Judges: The Jury's role with respect to Law, Fact and Justice
- Racism and Slave-Holding Capital: Robert Morris, Lemuel Shaw and Fugitive Slaves
- Corporate Fear of Civil Juries in the Rise of Negligence and Unions
- Privileges of Citizens and Their Lawyers
- the privilege of privacy
- the responsibility of lawyers
It was not at the time of our founding but has become a law of evidence that lawyers may not argue the injustice of a law to an American jury nor inform jurors of their power to acquit notwithstanding their conclusion that the defendant has violated the letter of the law as given them by the judge. Judges prevent lawyers from doing so by holding them in contempt of court. This threat to their physical liberty constrains the freedom of lawyers to speak on behalf of the client to the jury.
- assume the role of advocate for a client asserting a liberty interest which is fundamental to him. What are the constraints upon me in carrying out my role?
- ethics, my personal code, my inner sense of constraint on how i can act and be true to myself
- contempt of court, the judge's weapons for enforcement against a lawyer who acts against the judge's order
- what are the contemnor's rights when held in contempt by a judge?
- assume the role of advocate for a client asserting a liberty interest which is fundamental to him. What are the constraints upon me in carrying out my role?
- My Cousin Vinny: Lawyer Meets Client
GUILT Beyond Reasonable Doubt
The Ambiguity of Truth
- riddle of three hats
- the inference of self and perception of the perception of self by other
- Daniel Gilbert, He Who Cast the First Stone Probably Didn’t
- truth as correspondence asserted from coherence
- Nesson, "The Evidence or the Event? On Judicial Proof and the Acceptability of Verdicts"
- My Cousin Vinny: The Arraignment
Client's Truth
- Meet my Clients:three live cases to think through. In each case consider what evidence and argument to offer in support of the claim or defense. Consider the time, place, form and manner in which to make the offer.
- GPSTS - Poker and the Law
- frame a declaratory action in the Court of Public Opinion to legitimate poker and recognize the liberty to play online.
- University and RIAA
- frame a motion to quash a subpoena from a copyright holder to the university for the identity of a student downloader on grounds of undue burden
- Harvard Professors Nesson and Palfrey Tell RIAA : "Take a Hike"
- RIAA Targets New Colleges, Still Avoids Harvard
- Why the RIAA may be afraid of targeting Harvard students
- In the Fight Over Piracy, a Rare Stand for Privacy
Masks
Poker Teaches
open education for an open net
poker strategic thinking university
initial offerings by professors nesson and lederer
with Andrew Woods and Kevin Wallen, Annie Duke, Brandon Adams, Ken Stalter
participation invited by pst societies around the world (formed or in formation)
accompanied by bilateral pst tournaments
culminating in an online tournament followed by a face to face invitational
- Poker Teaches Strategic Thinking: Learn to Play One Card War
- introduction to poker as a game and as a metaphor
- play one card war
- a lesson from the professor- - Howard Lederer: Poker is a Strategic Betting Game
- analyze the final hand in The Cincinnati Kid: What was the kid's mistake?
- analyze in the final hand in Rounders: What hand can Teddy possibly have been playing? What was his tell?
- hold'em
- read and absorb at least the method and purpose of programming no-limit hold'em.
- articulate metaphors for each of the parameters of the program.
- skim for flavor, or dig deeper if you wish
- Binmore, Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, 2007)
- Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation ?, (Chap.1)
- Grossman, New Tack Wins Prisoners Dilemma
- Francis Beer, Games and Metaphors
- Baird, Game Theory and Law (1994)(Chap.1)
- Poker Teaches (Google Video)









