Commentary 1/12/06

In Jewett, it seemed in the case that he was suggesting that he just had a propensity to be misidentified, rather than a specific theory that there was some other person who committed the crime. These two thigns seems to be different.
I heard Arthur Miller is going to add an S&M day to his civ pro class.
wendy murphy makes me furious
- I think that may be her goal...
- I think we can all agree that ". . . it is still not probative to bring in irrelevant information about the victim."
I wonder if Murphy would be opposed to 'course of dealing' evidence in contracts disputes?
I was embarassed by the conduct of some of my classmates today. Snickering and expressions of disgust are never an appropriate response to a guest speaker's remarks. The content of those remarks, or one's position in relation to them, does not excuse this.

This commentary evolved into a discussion that can be found here