IP in EM-K12: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Research Questions== | ==Research Questions== | ||
#Define the main legal tools of protection (privatization) available for the field (patents, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, contracts, public domain) (remember the exercise done in genomics and proteomics). | #Define the main legal tools of protection (privatization) available for the field (patents, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, contracts, public domain) (remember the exercise done in genomics and proteomics). | ||
:(note to R.A. - try to create a matrix that cross references the previous two questions - let's try several ways to visualize how the narratives either hit barriers based on protection or can be synergistic via open licensing approaches - an example is the table in the Case Analysis Framework) | |||
= Navigation = | |||
[[Bibliography for Item 4 in EM]]<br> | |||
Back to [[The K-12 Level]]<br> | Back to [[The K-12 Level]]<br> | ||
Back to [[Educational Materials]] | Back to [[Educational Materials]] | ||
[[Category:Educational Materials]] | [[Category:Educational Materials]] | ||
Revision as of 15:14, 9 May 2009
Research Questions
- Define the main legal tools of protection (privatization) available for the field (patents, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, contracts, public domain) (remember the exercise done in genomics and proteomics).
- (note to R.A. - try to create a matrix that cross references the previous two questions - let's try several ways to visualize how the narratives either hit barriers based on protection or can be synergistic via open licensing approaches - an example is the table in the Case Analysis Framework)
Bibliography for Item 4 in EM
Back to The K-12 Level
Back to Educational Materials