An unlikely coalition of Christian evangelicals and liberal activists
joined forces to help persuade President Bush to announce a remarkable turnabout
this week in his administration's approach to the international AIDS crisis -- a
tripling of U.S. spending on AIDS relief.
Bush surprised even many Republicans when he used his State of the
Union address on Tuesday to call on Congress to spend $15 billion over the next
five years to help countries in Africa and the Caribbean fight the
pandemic.
The announcement represented a marked change from the position shortly
after Bush took office, when a top official publicly questioned the wisdom of
trying to save the lives of Africans who had contracted HIV. Officials said then
that money should be spent on preventing the spread of the disease in Africa but
would be wasted on expensive anti-AIDS drugs because African health systems were
not equipped to dispense the medicine properly.
Now the president is proposing that Washington spend lavishly on the
AIDS pandemic in Africa and the Caribbean, supplying drugs to 2 million
HIV-infected people and caring for 10 million others, including orphans whose
parents died of AIDS.
Authorities on the disease said those figures may be overly optimistic
unless the price of drugs falls. Even so, Jeffrey Sachs, a Columbia University
economist who is the AIDS adviser to U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, said:
"This is an enormous breakthrough. It's the first time in the history of this
pandemic that we are seeing a commitment for anything on the scale that is
necessary."
Few people outside Bush's inner circle knew of the president's growing
interest in the issue, and his aides said that to keep his surprise, they
deliberately avoided consulting many people outside the White House. Officials
said that, in fact, the policy had percolated for months at the higher level of
the administration, fueled in part by quiet lobbying from evangelical Christians
and AIDS activists, special interest from key Bush advisers and a push from the
new Senate majority leader, Bill Frist (R-Tenn.).
Administration officials said the AIDS epidemic has become a major
cause for evangelical Christians, a crucial part of the president's political
base because so many of them are affiliated with missions in Africa.
Conservative politicians' concern about the disease has risen steadily over the
past year as they became convinced that AIDS in the developing world is a
massive humanitarian crisis that in most cases has nothing to do with the
morality of the victims.
Frist, who spends part of each year in Africa as a medical missionary
to people with AIDS, raised the issue of AIDS funding with Bush during a White
House meeting last year. A congressional source said Bush responded
knowledgeably, even mentioning the names of specific drugs.
The source said Bush replied, "I want you to show me how this money can
be usefully spent and not just going down a rat hole, and I'm willing to put
real money on the table."
Administration officials said politics was not the major reason for the
AIDS initiative but acknowledged there could be beneficial ripple effects,
especially in helping burnish the country's image abroad. The AIDS announcement
could also remind moderate voters of Bush's claim to be a compassionate
conservative at a time when his administration is tacking right on economic
policy, judicial nominations and other issues.
A senior administration official said yesterday that the pledge "far
outstrips anything that has been done in the past by any government" in AIDS
treatment. Bush told an audience in Grand Rapids, Mich., yesterday that he views
the project as a chance for "a moral nation" to use its wealth and ability to
help "solve unimaginable problems, to help the people who are needlessly
dying."
"We can make a huge difference," he said. "I want people to step back
at some point in time and say, 'Thank God for America and our generosity, as
lives were saved.' "
Bush's plan calls for spending $2 billion in the fiscal year that
begins Oct. 1. About $10 billion of the $15 billion total would represent new
commitments. Bush designated just $1 billion of the total for the Geneva-based
Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
Some AIDS experts complained that the administration's desire to
control most of the money undermines the purpose of the fund, which is to assure
that donations from rich countries are channeled in a coherent and
cost-effective manner.
Anil Soni, adviser to the Global Fund's executive director, said that
Bush was "taking a unilateral approach" that could hamper efforts to care for
victims across all borders.
Nevertheless, Steven Radelet, a scholar at the Center for Global
Development, echoed many specialists in the subject when he said, "The
administration has come a long way in the last two years." A big factor behind
its new approach, he said, was mounting evidence that AIDS treatment can work in
Africa.
Administration officials said Bush, who had planned to announce the
effort during a trip to Africa that had been scheduled for this month but was
postponed, was convinced of the scale of the crisis in part because of trips to
Africa last year by the outgoing Treasury secretary, Paul H. O'Neill, and by
Commerce Secretary Donald L. Evans.
Evans said that he told Bush about the heartbreaking scourge he had
witnessed and that Bush believes passionately that "we're here to serve other
people and love our neighbors, and these are our neighbors."
The effort was championed inside the West Wing by Deputy Chief of Staff
Joshua Bolten, who told a colleague several months ago, "We need to do something
major on this." Michael Gerson, Bush's chief speechwriter, also took an early
interest in the issue, and an administration official said he has talked for
months about "the importance of speaking to this as a moral matter."
Several administration officials have become friends of
Bono, the lead singer of U2, who said in an interview from Dublin that Bush's
announcement shows how the world has changed. "If you think back just six months
or a year, conservatives, especially religious conservatives, were very
skeptical about this, and we had to explain that if you can't get the drugs, why
would you test, and if you don't get people testing, we can't control the
virus," Bono said. "All these points have sunk in."