Video Archive of the March 26, 1999 Wiggin & Dana Symposium on United States v. Microsoft hosted by the Connecticut Law Review
Requires the free RealPlayer version 5.0 or greater

• Good Morning - Peter Barile III, Symposium Editor
• Moderator's Introduction - Robert Langer, Partner, Wiggin & Dana
  
  
• "The Importance of the Microsoft Case," Albert Foer, President, American Antitrust Institute
• "The Proper Standard for Identifying Truly Monopolistic Practices: Why Microsoft Hasn't Violated the Antitrust Laws," Charles (Rick) Rule, Partner, Covington & Burling
• "Remedies for Monopolization," William Kovacic, Professor of Law, George Washington University Law School
• "Teaching Antitrust During Microsoft," Leonard Orland, Professor of Law, University of Connecticut School of Law (part 1), (part 2)
• Panel Discussion
  
  
• "Identifying Integration and Exclusion in the Microsoft Case," William Page, Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law
• "Microsoft and the Browser Wars: Fit to be Tied," Robert Levy, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studiees, Cato Institute
• "So, What's the Remedy?," Jonathan Zittrain, Executive Director, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School
• Panel Discussion & Closing Remarks

---

Ben Edelman
The Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School