[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] A wonderful bit of a satire in the Register
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] A wonderful bit of a satire in the Register
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:08:10 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcQGRNwBqph3pdVjRLynOGrpLDMiRg==
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] A wonderful bit of a satire in the Register
He had given implicit permission for the _city_ to make
use of his ip. Not for a private party.
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> [mailto:email@example.com]On Behalf Of
> Will Bickford
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 5:19 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] A wonderful bit of a satire in the Register
> Wow. That's awesome.
> Although in this case I think that the defendant doesn't have
> much of a
> case. He was sending his "IP" straight to the sewer - having
> never signed
> a contract with the city's sewer system. So you could argue
> that he had
> given implicit permission for the use of his "IP".
> Very nice article nonetheless.
> At 12:45 PM 3/9/2004, you wrote:
> >Can anyone say SCO (or MPAA or RIAA)? Sort of puts it in
> >doesn't it?
> >BOFH: Protecting bodily waste in the public domain