[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Churches sue critic for linking and posting a C&Dletter
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Churches sue critic for linking and posting a C&Dletter
- From: Noah silva <nsilva(at)atari-source.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:39:04 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I think... (totally not based on law, just commen sense). If they send it
to me, for free, without me asking, and it is a personal thing, I have the
right to post it wherever I like. What if my company sent me a letter
saying "you're fired, and fuck you with a big broomstick". I couldn't
post it to show how unprofessional they were? They are going to copyright
-- noah silva
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Arnold G. Reinhold wrote:
> This case looks like a nasty cat fight and I'm not sure linking is
> the biggest issue. But one part of the case may be of interest.
> Plaintiffs had previously sent defendants a cease and desist e-mail.
> They claim that e-mail included a copyright notice. Defendants posted
> the letter to their web site (without the copyright notice, but the
> long page it's on http://www.archbishops.org/cjthree.htm includes
> their own copyright notice). It their suit, plaintiffs complain that
> posting their letter violated their copyright.
> Since notices are not required for copyright, this raises the general
> question of whether it is permitted under copyright law to post
> hostile legal notices you receive, e.g. under section 512.
> Arnold Reinhold
> At 12:22 PM -0500 2/27/02, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> >Status: U
> >Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:17:43 -0500
> >To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >From: Declan McCullagh <email@example.com>
> >Subject: FC: Churches sue critic for linking; EFF Arriba framing brief
> >Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
> >Reply-To: email@example.com
> >The relevant excerpt from the complaint alleges that Tony Begonja "publishes
> >links to the Plaintiffs' registered copyrighted material and non-registered
> >copyrighted material," and also that he is "publishing deceptively named
> >links which misrepresent and cast the target copyrighted material of the
> >Plaintiffs into a false light."
> >Background on the right to link freely (or not):
> >Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:31:08 -0600
> >From: "The Rev. Tony Begonja" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >To: Declan McCullagh <email@example.com>
> >Subject: FYI: CJ3 finally actually sued me
> >CJ3 finally actually sued me.
> >See http://www.ind-movement.org/lawsuit/ for info.
> >The EFF helped me get a lawyer.