[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Pro DMCA Argument Information ?
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Pro DMCA Argument Information ?
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:05:07 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
The best summary of the situation that I am aware of is here:
This is a "for comment" draft that the author posted to this list, but it
really does cover the issue quite well. Warning: it is fairly long and
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Sanchez [mailto:DSanchez@fcci-group.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:07 PM
> To: Dvd Discussion Group (E-mail)
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] Pro DMCA Argument Information ?
> I trying to put together a position paper to help order my
> thoughts so that when I'm talking with friends and colleagues
> about the DMCA I can present coherent reasons. In order to
> better develop a clear and concise refutation of the DMCA and
> the reasons for its existence, I was looking for information
> on the reasons proponents of the DMCA state it is necessary.
> However, a Google search returns an enormous number of hits
> with most either being an explanation of the Act or
> opposition to it. Aside from a generic "We need it to stop
> piracy", I have been unable to find even a single site,
> journal or magazine article enumerating the reasons it is
> necessary when one considers the fact that we already have
> laws regarding copyright.
> Does anyone know of a source or sources that I can reference?