[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
- From: "Harold Eaton" <haceaton(at)hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 20:22:26 -0500
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
>This may be of interest to the crowd here because it is another free speech
>the internet case: Intel v. Hamidi
Cool, now we can all enjoin telephone solicitors from calling
our homes. I think a class action could even recover
huge damages under this trespass theory. I pay for my telephone,
telemarketers deprive me of it's value. Anyone paying for
caller ID can even show costs incurred in order to combat the
Hey, I also own my mailbox, and all that unsolicited mail is
also depriving me of its full value - not to mention the huge
costs to dispose of the resulting waste. Trespass-o-rama!
Where do I sign up for THAT class action suit?
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.