[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 14:49:26 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Neither. It's a SMALL CLAIMS COURT MATTER.
30,000 employees take 6 seconds each to delete email (obviously loyal
Intel employees wouldn't read it once they know that intel didn't want
them to read it.)
This is 180,000 seconds of productivity lost (exercise for alert reader.
the intel employee is reading email. are they really loosing that much
productivity because of THIS email?)
180,000 sec = 50 hrs.
Assuming the average Intel employee is paid $100/hr means that the company
is out $5000 which is the limit of small claims in California.
I contend the ruling should be overturned because the matter was
originally tried in the WRONG COURT ;-)
Richard Hartman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent by: email@example.com
12/12/01 10:23 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com>,
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
This seems to be less of a spam issue and more of a harassment issue.
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Taylor [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 6:37 AM
> To: dvd-discuss
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] Interesting Spam v Free Speech Case
> This may be of interest to the crowd here because it is
> another free speech on
> the internet case: Intel v. Hamidi
> Forwarded from posting on Declan's list:
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
> your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
> or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com