[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT [dvd-discuss] Re: nimmer
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: OT [dvd-discuss] Re: nimmer
- From: "Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe(at)usg.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 10:06:53 -0600
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
There was a young law student named Rex,
who had very small organs of sex.
When charged with exposure,
he said with composure:
"de minimis non curat lex."
(found on www.duhaime.org/jokes.htm -- this just reminded
me of it)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Zulauf [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:05 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: nimmer
> Seth David Schoen wrote:
> > Michael A Rolenz writes:
> > > I believe that unless the work is published
> > > commercially, the matter is beneath the recognition of
> the court (what's
> > > the latin phrase?).
> > "De minimis"?
> "De minimis non curat lex" == "trivialities are not the subject of the
> which is a good thing given the federal case some parent want to make
> over a blow strike call in little league.