Re: [dvd-discuss] Re: _DVDCCA v. Bunner_ - free speech loses!

["D. C. Sessions" <dcs(at)lumbercartel.com>]

microlenz@earthlink.net wrote:

> They punted again....throughout the decision the word "assumed" pops up often 
> enough that it's deliberate. Moreno pretty much called the majority on that in 
> his concurring decision. He stated he concurred with their decision but not 
> their reasons. He doesn't assume the facts of the lower courts and comes to a 
> different conclusion and so assumes nothing but concludes the court was wrong.

I read the emphasis on "relying on the findings of the lower Court" to
be a rather heavy-handed hint that the CSC was /very/ likely to
reverse if that finding landed on them again.

-- 
begin signature.exe
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?