[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] "under penalty of perjury"
On 28 Feb 2003 at 19:09, Jim Bauer wrote:
Date sent: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:09:15 -0500
From: Jim Bauer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] "under penalty of perjury"
Organization: Copies to: Send reply to: email@example.com
> Ken Arromdee <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >If you read the message carefully, the "penalty of perjury" part only applies
> >to the statement that the BSA is authorized on behalf of the copyright owners
> >listed in the notice. So not in this case.
> But they were not authorized by the Copyright holders of the files
> in question.
If so, then they have NO legal authority since they are not an agent of the
copyright holder. I find that hard to believe but if so, then they must pay the
penalty of perjury...but to whom? What court did they swear in front of? What
court has jurisdiction?
> Jim Bauer, email@example.com