[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Court Sides With Geac in Mainframe Software Case
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Court Sides With Geac in Mainframe Software Case
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:13:06 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
"It's a little scary to suggest that somebody with a copyright has the
prerogative to refuse any third party from servicing its software," said
Blecher, a partner at Blecher & Collins LLC in Los Angeles. "It gives such
people a monopoly on their service business."
Note that this is an issue also in the case of automobile
diagnostic systems. As engines get more advanced, the
auto manufacturers have integrated diagnostic chips into
them. Now the meaning of some of the diagnostic codes
are being witheld from non-dealer service centers. I
don't think this comes under the DMCA, since diagnostic
information is not copyrightable, but there is certainly
a parallel as far as the "maintaining a monopoly in their
service business" aspect.
Any of this counterable w/ RICO?
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: D. C. Sessions [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 7:34 PM
> To: DVD-Discuss
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Court Sides With Geac in Mainframe Software
> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 13:34, Dean Sanchez wrote:
> > Did anyone notice the outcome of this case? The Appeals
> court is basically stating that modifying code for
> interoperability is copyright infringement. We don't want to
> have any of the "promoting progress" nonsense getting in the
> way of corporate profits, do we? Everyone should know by now
> that reverse engineering is bad, bad, bad!
> No comments on whether Grace intends to appeal to the USSC.
> Given the nature of the case, it looks like a natural. The
> issues are less muddy than with some of the others we discuss
> | The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. |
> | Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. |
> +--------------- D. C. Sessions <firstname.lastname@example.org> --------------+