[dvd-discuss] Tom Poe on ALERT: CBDTPA = Intel "Trusted Computing" Architecture?

[Seth Johnson <seth.johnson(at)realmeasures.dyndns.org>]

Tom:  Care to elaborate on the ISP connection?  Seth

(A reply from Tom Poe, from the DMCA Discussion list,
DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org.  -- Seth)

-------- Original Message --------
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 09:03:51 -0700
From: tom poe <tompoe@renonevada.net>


Hi:  It should also be noted that this news strengthens the
import of the comment made in the BPDG report alluding to no
"grandfather" clause for legacy machines, and the need to
eliminate them in a short timeframe, rather than permit them
to stay in the market for several years.

I suspect there is more to the role of the local ISP's in
how legacy machines will be removed from Internet access.

Thanks,
Tom Poe
Reno, NV
http://www.studioforrecording.org/
http://www.ibiblio.org/studioforrecording/

Seth Johnson wrote:

>(This email proposes that Hollings' Bill was crafted with an
>eye towards Intel's "Trusted Computing Platform
>Architecture."  This goes along with the position espoused
>by the Intel representative at the Connectivity 2002
>conference, and the reserved support of Intel's amicus
>curiae brief in the Eldred vs. Ashcroft case.  Forwarded
>from the No DMCA in Canada list,
>canada-dmca-opponents@flora.org; originally from the
>Cryptography list, cryptography@wasabisystems.com.  -- Seth)

-- 

[CC] Counter-copyright:
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/cc/cc.html