[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Patented copyright ...
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Patented copyright ...
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:08:14 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I don't know that it is a protection mechanism in the
DMCA sense ... it is a scheme for gaining _legal_
protection using copyright instead of patent ... but
I suppose if the MP3 itself has a copy-protection bit
... hmmm ...
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Patented copyright ...
> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:44:46AM -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > Now I see a flaw here ... sure, they own the copyright
> > on the genetic "music" ... and if I play it on the radio
> > I'll owe them royalties ... but if I make a drug based
> > on the DNA sequence that has nothing to do with the encoded
> > music ... or that would be my take on this scheme.
> they'd probably say you had to circumvent a protection system in order
> to find the formula for your drug...
> New GPG Key issued (old key expired):
> pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01
> 9FA1 2D7A 04F5