[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss]DMCA and the Church Of Scientology
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss]DMCA and the Church Of Scientology
- From: "Ernest Miller" <ernest.miller(at)aya.yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:09:44 -0400
- References: <55D41E46BAD58E4BBA52AA3798D6C6C72CDB23@postal.fcci-group.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
The Google issue is a take down issue of the DMCA.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Sanchez" <DSanchez@fcci-group.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss]DMCA and the Church Of Scientology
> I was basing my statement on news articles which cite the takedown
provision as the reason for the removal. One such is foxnews:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,49699,00.html. I know that depending on
the media for accurate info can be dangerous, but when taken with a pound of
salt, it may be useful.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Hosgood [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 9:32 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss]DMCA and the Church Of Scientology
> Dean Sanchez writes:
> > I think that it is referring to the part of the DMCA that was added to
> > indemnify ISPs from copyright infringement - the takedown notice.
> No offence intended to you Dean, but:
> Google (who are a search engine, not an ISP) are being accused of
> violation just because they list some other site (not scientology.com)
> on a list of things found after a search for "scientology"?
> There must be more to it, or surely Google would tell them to go stick
> heads in a lavatory and pull the flush.
> Steve Hosgood |
> firstname.lastname@example.org | "A good plan today is better
> Phone: +44 1792 203707 + ask for Steve | than a perfect plan
> Fax: +44 70922 70944 | - Conrad Brean
> http://tallyho.bc.nu/~steve | ( from the film "Wag the