[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] An interesting case from 9th Circuit Appeals court
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] An interesting case from 9th Circuit Appeals court
- From: Stephen L Johnson <sjohnson(at)monsters.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 23:42:46 -0600
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I just found a like to this store on Slash Dot (www.slashdot.org). Here is
the link to the story on law.com (which might be not be permissible in the
The gist of the decision is that creating thumbnails of images is fair use.
But displaying the full image is a violation of copyright. The case stems from
an Internet image search engine which displayed thumbnails and inline linking
to the full size images.
The case seems tangential to the 2600 case. But it's interesting. According
to the article, it looks like it lays the foundation that link and framing
can't be done with permission.
It is a refreshing decision to me. At least one court "get's it". Not every
new digital technology is a tool for "Piracy!!!" aka copyright violation.
Stephen L Johnson <email@example.com>