[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Would this consistute circumvention.
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Would this consistute circumvention.
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 14:32:20 -0800
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Look at this related link. Another case of legal self help? The notion
that intellectual property deserved "John Wayne" frontier justice is so
Sony's Cactus tests, carried out, claims New
Scientist, in Slovakia and the Czech Republic
were not set to nuke hi-fi equipment, but they
easily could have been it seems.
It will make an interesting test case when a
punter sues Sony for blowing up their
loudspeakers after playing an allegedly pirate
CD, particularly if the music industry and
consumer electronics companies haven't issued
warnings that pirate CDs can seriously damage
"John Zulauf" <email@example.com>
Sent by: firstname.lastname@example.org
11/09/01 01:37 PM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Would this consistute circumvention.
Apparently I was right about the "built-in player to hide CD data
protection" -- ugh!
BTW I haven't seen any argument about the Catus Data style data
corruption^Wprotection vs. the DMCA. I doesn't require and information
or treatement with the authority of the copyright holder, only error
correction processing soooo, how can that be a 1201 effective TPM?