[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- From: Bryan Taylor <bryan_w_taylor(at)yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 17:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
--- Scott A Crosby <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > As long as due process is strictly observed, the final outcome is
> > completely acceptable.
> Its not.
> Remember, MAPS is a secret; the blacklist is secret, the deliberations
> they use when adding to the blacklist are secret. I don't call this due
First, private entities don't owe you due process, nor do they owe you an
explaination for why they ostracize you.
If I want to delegate filtering according to the MAPS list without needing to
know the details, I am free to do that. If I change my mind I can ask to see
the list. When they refuse, per their policy, I can change my email provider.
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.