[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF opposes blacklisting spammers
- From: Bryan Taylor <bryan_w_taylor(at)yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
- In-Reply-To: <OF5605E6AB.D572B8A8-ON88256AEA.005B14D0@aero.org>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
--- Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org wrote:
> So what is spam? Without a good definition, only nonsensical laws can be
I didn't actually see what law the EFF was for or against. They speak out
against MAPS, which as best I can tell is a completely private intitiative. Did
I miss something?
If the government is proposing mandating ISP use MAPS then I oppose such a law
as violating free speech. Conversely if the EFF wants the government to force
ISP's not to use MAPS, then this also violates free speech (their client's
right to select what speech is received).
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.