[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Music biz wants tougher DMCA, CPRM 2 to protect copyright
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Music biz wants tougher DMCA, CPRM 2 to protect copyright
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 10:20:50 -0700
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
The "of course" was not obvious to me. But fortunately
The Register has posted their own account.
Basically, they admit to posting an unsubstantiated
story before even minimal fact checking. (The "of course"
that Declan mentions may have to do w/ the fact that some
of the alleged attendees are no longer with the companies
they were said to be representing ...)
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Declan McCullagh [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 7:53 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Music biz wants tougher DMCA, CPRM 2 to
> protect copyright
> That article is, of course, a hoax.
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:36:30AM -0400, Dean Sanchez wrote:
> > They're at it again. It's obvious that the industry believes that
> > citizens should only have the 'rights' that the industry is
> willing to
> > grant.
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/22087.html